To help you evaluate the second hypothesis, i first recoded, for every of the items towards the standing level, the fresh portion of solutions you to tell you when the husbands have less, equivalent or higher ratings, specifically, position, with hypogamy, for example husbands have lower condition than just wives, homogamy, definition equivalent standing, and you can hypergamy, definition husbands that have high reputation than just spouses. Into possible relationship off nation, analyses was indeed extreme during the degree (X 2 =11.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and economic perception out-of a prospective split up (X 2 =nine.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Research revealed that, having Spanish participants, there is far more degree hypogamy, whereas for Dominican players there is so much more education homogamy. Concerning financial activities if there is divorce or separation, while there is significantly more homogamy to own Foreign language members, discover even more hypergamy to own Dominicans (find Contour step 1).
Having previous marriages or otherwise not wasn’t related so you can variations in updates. Concerning the possible organization between reputation and you can ages hitched, high associations was indeed included in fitness (X 2 =fourteen.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), although to own partners y is out there (40.4%, each), for couples y is available (43.4%). In other words, toward category with increased age hitched, husbands keeps down wellness status. That have children out of previous failed marriages and achieving youngsters regarding latest relationships did not significantly apply to status.
Within the contribution, the fresh new analyses regarding 2nd theory indicated that in comparison to all of our expectations, the biggest function associated to help you updates is the nation.
Univariate examination found significant variations in factor step 1 (F=5
To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses nalgadas solteros para citas sitio de nalgadas revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).
Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.
Eventually, hypogamy issues in the The country of spain obtained significantly lower than hypogamy circumstances in Dominican Republic
Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.
Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).